Thursday, 1 May 2008

week 8 - Are subcultures a sign of revolt or an expression of style?

Sub-cultures consist of many different people from different backgrounds, all with unique personalities, so I think it is unfair to generalise that one whole subculture is purely a sign of revolt or an expression of style. However, I think some people join in with certain subcultures because of these reasons. For example, the chav phase that has recently come about is a prime example of a number of people who are involved because it is a way to revolt. A lot of people look down on chavs as violant thugs, and so this spurs some people on to be part of this sub-culture in a bid to revolt. However, I think it is unfair to look at a whole sub-culture as everyone joining it to revolt or as an expression of style. To conclude, I think some people do join subcultures in a bid to revolt or as an expression of style, like many mods, however, I believe it is wrong to tar a whole culture with the same brush.

1 comment:

Scaletlancer said...

I think that your first sentence rather misses the point that these people from varied walks of life consciously partake in subcultures in order to form a group identity. I am not sure that Chavs are a subculture in the same sense as Punks or Skinheads as I doubt that many people identify themselves as a Chav. While I sympathise with the opinion that the answer to the question probably rests somewhere in the middle you are not really attempting to gain one.